Busby to shut Nine West and Mango

All free-standing stores under both these brands will close their doors by the end of March

Article by COLLEEN GOKO AND REITUMETSE PITSO for BDLIVE
Nine West will walk out of SA and Mango will follow suit as the House of Busby alters its portfolio to match domestic needs, the group said.
NINE

Head of marketing Leane Adolph said on Wednesday all free-standing stores under both these brands would close by the end of March.

“The company regularly reviews the portfolio’s performance and relevance to market and decided to move the Mango business into the store-in-store concept within Edgars. Similarly, with Nine West, we will keep a wholesale presence [for handbags] in the SA market through Edgars,” she said.

The House of Busby owns the exclusive rights to both Mango and Nine West. The Nine West licence was acquired in 1999 and, until recently, had 13 stand-alone stores throughout the country. Nine West sells footwear, handbags, eyewear and accessories.

The Mango licence was acquired in 2006 and there were nine stand-alone stores in SA. Mango now has 35 store-in-stores in Edgars stores nationwide. Mango sells apparel and accessories. Adolph said that rumours of Busby coming under business rescue were untrue, adding it was not expected that there would be any job losses as a result of the decision to close shop for the brands as affected staff would be accommodated within the group’s structures.

MANGO

The House of Busby was delisted from the JSE in May 2008, when management, together with Ethos Private Equity, acquired control. The Busby enterprise is valued at about R1.3bn. Busby also owns exclusive rights to many other well-known international brands in SA including Aldo, Forever New, Guess, Steve Madden and Call it Spring.

In the past year, it has acquired the master licences for two new brands, Women’secret and 3INA, which further diversified its portfolio from footwear, apparel and luggage to include intimate apparel and cosmetics.

Adolph said the group was confident that the rejigging of the portfolio would allow it to focus on the growth of the newly acquired brands and to optimise its existing portfolio, “re-emphasising the importance of great customer service and a commitment to delivering consistent, quality, international product at prices that reflect customer value”.

Independent analyst Syd Vianello said it was possible that the group’s pricing model had made Mango and Nine West uncompetitive in a market that was under stress and searching for lower price points.

Retail insights from Design Indaba 2017

BY: GABRIELLE MIXON for BIZCOMMUNITY
Fortunate enough to attend the 2017 Design Indaba and sit in to hear some of the most creative people in the world speak, I walked out with some insights that fashion retail brands can look into and implement as part of their current strategies.

As remarkable as their talks were it is important to take out key things that are applicable to many brands as these are the people that are at the forefront of trends and consumer insights in their innovations and creations. That led me to the following trends.

Digital shop

Digital is a big part of the consumer’s life but this element isn’t well-integrated into South Africa’s shopping environment. Consumers often follow brands online yet the in-store experience doesn’t bring digital to life in a way that is integrated. Pauline Saglio, who spoke at this year’s Design Indaba, showed the beauty and importance of bringing digital into a shop through interactive experiences that will wow the consumer. Consider your brand’s online personality and presence on social media, and how can you incorporate these aspects into the retail space.

Dressing is play

Shoko Tamura who showcased her Urban Play wearable tech jacket at this year’s Design Indaba explains that through fashion the young consumer can integrate the elements of music and lights to enhance their social experience and express themselves more artistically. Considering our youth market within South Africa we know they love fashion, they express themselves greatly through music and they are highly attracted to colour and lights (mostly for its attractiveness on social media).

This is what a party or event brings to life and while young consumers dress in their best for these nights out how can a brand really bring music, light and fashion into one experience that connects with the consumer? Dressing, music and lights can be brought together to help the consumer express themselves.

Authentic fabrication

Storytelling is endless. Telling stories through fabric is an opportunity for brands to take advantage of the places they source these fabrics from. At the conference this year we saw how fabric can be used as a medium for telling a story. As a brand’s fabrics come from different places it is a great opportunity to share about where these fabrics come from and take the consumer on a journey to an entirely different place.

We know that fashion trends repeat themselves but there is still innovation in textile-making. Be it unique prints, new fabric compositions or places foreign to the consumer where the fabric is made it is an endless source to tell interesting stories to the consumer. As consumers are increasingly aware and questioning of where their products come from and who made them, telling stories about fabric in real, unique and interesting ways will engage the consumer and show a level of transparency in how the products they wear are produced and where they are produced.

Design for equality

Grace Jun spoke about design for inclusion. In marketing, you learn about niche markets and a specific target market but with travel bans making people feel like the world is taking a step backwards it is important to stand for inclusivity. Especially in fashion.

384145-625x325

Designing for inclusion tackles the need to make clothing for people with disabilities or unique needs. These are people who are often forgotten about. As we strive to live in an equal society fashion is an important space to express this desire and to include and make consideration for all people in offerings.

These are trends that will be growing and can impact a fashion brand’s retail strategy. To increase sales it is vital to stay abreast of these new innovations in order to start thinking ahead about how your strategy will incorporate these elements.

Author : Gabrielle Mixon

Alarm bells ringing for millennial fashion brands

This article was written by Guy Courtin for Just Style. 

A recent survey, commissioned by GT Nexus and conducted by research company YouGov, confirmed a lack of brand loyalty among millennials. For the fashion industry, the devil is truly in the detail of this research as it not only sounds a series of clear warning bells to fashion brands, but also reveals some surprising truths about influencing this most fickle of markets.

Alarm one: brand loyalty is dead

This article is not the place to debate the definition or attributes of millennials. There are already small libraries worth of books dedicated to that endeavour. Suffice it to say, the demographic of those born 1983 to just before the millennium is one of the most widely studied markets.

While the attributes of millennials are a cause of some debate, one aspect of consensus is the unrivalled plethora of alternative brands for them to identify with, and spend money on. This has led to the death of brand loyalty, as millennials switch quickly and with ease, thanks to the range of shopping channels they have at their disposal.

Globally, 61% of millennials have switched their favourite brand in the past 12 months. And perhaps even more telling is that more of them don’t know or cannot recall if they have switched, compared to those who are sure they have not. Simply put, brands may be important to millennials, but brand loyalty is not.

Alarm two: a lot of fashion retail may have misread the millennial market

Whilst food and drink top the list of product categories most accustomed to defection, fashion comes in a close second. 42% said fashion would be the most likely product category they would change. That is an outright admission by four in every ten customers aged 18-34 that they will change brands.

In the case of Levi’s, Forever 21, Under Armour, Vans, Victoria’s Secret, River Island, Nike or any other fashion brand whose number one market is millennials, this is a concern.

Perhaps more worrying, is the evidence that fashion brands may have misread how to address this. There is evidence that contrary to popular belief, consumer-facing marketing factors, such as a brand’s social media presence, mobile apps or a cool website, don’t have a big impact on millennials’ brand loyalty.

Product quality and availability remain the top two factors that will cause millennials to change brands

It turns out that the top two factors that will cause this demographic to change brands are exactly the same as those that would have caused the same change in the behaviour of their parents or grandparents: product quality and availability.

At the risk of stating the obvious, it is worth noting that both of these major disloyalty factors fall into the “behind-the-scenes” domains of operations, logistics and supply chain management.

Whilst it is no surprise to see a high percentage of this demographic shifting brand loyalty frequently, fashion brands have often previously thought of millennials as being drawn to cool, edgy and flashy front-end brand experiences. This is simply not the case.

Alarms three and four: quality and availability

This new realisation should sound the next alarm bells for fashion manufacturers and retailers. Expectations of product quality continue to rise, even throughout fast fashion and cheap chic brands. Better quality typically means more cost but now, if low-cost fashion still fails to meet millennial expectations of quality, there is a very real risk of losing customers.

One of the basic truisms of fashion is you cannot sell what you don’t have available. This goes for online, in store or across a multi-channel experience. And whilst there are now more options than ever to fulfil an order, the failure to do that on the millennial customer’s first visit may cost a fashion brand more than just one lost sale.

Retailers are becoming ever more dependent on the supply chain as a source of competitive advantage

As part of a strategy to reclaim lost market share, Adidas is going to start offering customised shoes to appeal to millennials. It is also working to reduce the time between when products are designed and when they hit shelves. These are both initiatives that live or die with the success of an agile supply chain. Retailers are becoming ever more dependent on the supply chain as a source of competitive advantage.

Alarm five: ethical and environmental profile

And it does not stop there. Millennials care about how their favourite brands are made. 25% of respondents would turn on a brand if it doesn’t treat or pay its workers fairly. 20% would switch brands if the product isn’t environmentally friendly.

As an industry, fashion is often in the spotlight for its ethical or environmental performance. It is clear from these results that not only are millennials concerned with what goes on behind the scenes of a brand and how it produces goods or operates, but that ethical, responsible business practice is now a source of competitive advantage.

Initiatives such as ‘Love Fashion, Hate Sweatshops,’ send a very clear message to millennial brands. If a fashion brand doesn’t respect the workers creating the goods on sale – either inside an organisation or throughout supply chains – customers will consider leaving that brand.

This is of course equal part risk and opportunity; and visibility throughout a supply chain is a critical tool in ensuring that a brand can defend – or trumpet – its ethical or environmental track record.

Thankfully, fashion has a growing track record in developing progressive, effective initiatives that harness better business practices and commercial growth. It will be the millennial market that continues to drive this synthesis, rewarding brands that can use their supply chain in this way.
About the author: Guy Courtin is vice president of industry and solution strategy for retail and fashion at GT Nexus, a cloud-based global trade and supply chain management network that connects all parties and orchestrates the movement of goods, data and money.

Fashion Now: How rife is discounting in fashion?

By Gemma Goldfingle for Retailweek

Fashion Now, Retail Week’s new report with Barclaycard and Rakuten Marketing, looks into what retailers can learn from the turbulent past 12 months in the sector.

Seasonal sale periods have almost become a thing of the past in fashion retail and shoppers have been inundated with promotions over the past three or so years.

Despite many retailers fighting to protect full price sales through reducing the number of days they are on sale, data from WGSN INStock shows the percentage of markdown stock in the UK clothing, footwear and accessories market increased from 46% in 2015 to 48% in 2016.

Fashion Now 1

The traditional January sales period unsurprisingly still sees the highest level of markdowns, with the UK high street having offered 55% of its stock at a discounted price in January 2016.

“The womenswear market is rife for discounting, with retailers not able to rely on this sector for strong margins”

However, WGSN INStock data also indicates that markdowns were rife throughout the rest of the year, with the total market offering at least 44% of its stock at a discount in any given month throughout the year.

The womenswear market is rife for discounting, with retailers not able to rely on this sector for strong margins and instead having to drive full price revenue through additional categories, such as homewares, gifting and beauty.

Just under half of the womenswear clothing, accessories and footwear market went into markdown during 2016 at 49%, rising one percentage point year on year.

Menswear markdowns has also risen, from 43% of products in 2015 to 45% of products in 2016.

Hot or Not?

Throughout 2016 female shoppers embraced products with enhanced features, specifically in tailoring and ruffled blouses, pleated skirts and duster coats. These were among the most popular subcategories in the second half of 2016.

Multi-functional and trans-seasonal products were also popular as consumers sought greater value in their purchases.

Fitness leggings, padded jackets and casual sweaters all performed strongly during this period.

Conversely, subcategories that did not offer as much opportunity for wear, including gilets, capes and fitness shorts, drove the highest percentage of markdown throughout the six-month period.

Our research has found that women shop more frequently than men for fashion, and it is therefore important to ensure product newness to fulfil consumer interest in the womenswear market.

Over the past two years, the dress category was considered a key area of sales growth for retailers. In fact, the dresses contributed the highest level of newness across the year.

“The level of newness declined in [the tops] category throughout 2016 as retailers became more experimental in tailoring, offering fashion trends through increased styling in shirts and blouses”

This was particularly evident during the first half of 2016 as the percentage of dresses within new apparel increased by 1.3 percentage points year on year.

At the same time, the presence of jumpsuits and playsuits throughout the sector grew in 2016, which has allowed retailers to negotiate lower cost prices when ordering higher volumes.

Therefore, consumers benefited from lower retail prices within this category during 2016, with average retail prices across the market down by 10%.

Over the year, 40% of this category cost the consumer under £30 in 2016 compared with 38% of products in 2015.

Meanwhile, the tops category continues to play a key role in the product mix in womenswear, representing the second highest number of options after dresses.

Fashion Now 2

However, the level of newness declined in this category throughout 2016 as retailers became more experimental in tailoring, offering fashion trends through increased styling in shirts and blouses.

As a result, newness in the shirts and blouses category increased by 1.2 percentage points during the first half of 2016 year on year – representing 6% of the product mix.

Following an increased focus on this product category, design aesthetics were heightened in shirts and blouses, with manufacturing prices edging up as a result.

This resulted in increased retail prices in the category – up 12% on average in 2016 – to protect retailers’ margins.

Changing buying cycles

As consumers’ shopping habits have evolved, retailers have responded by adapting their buying patterns.

Furthermore, unseasonable weather has suppressed traditional buying cycles and modification has been required as a result.

The change is most noticeable within the mid-to-premium markets, where the product mix for heavy winter items, such as jackets and coats, has reduced throughout 2016.

With this, retailers have also moved product launch dates to accommodate for the reduction in heavy winter items, with the percentage of new knitwear options introduced throughout the latter half of 2016 increasing year on year, compared with a reduction in newness during the first half of the year.

Therefore, as more retailers embrace non-traditional buying cycles, product newness will become more reactive towards consumer behaviour in order to reduce markdown and drive full-price sales.

Download the full Fashion Now report. 

Epson Panel Explores Tech’s Impact on Fashion

Author : Caitlin Kelly

NEW YORK—Whether you’re a small startup designer or a long-established global brand, digital technology is becoming an ever more essential part of the fashion supply chain, industry experts agree.

A seven-member panel, convened by Epson to launch New York Fashion Week, brought together a diverse range of viewpoints from academia, event management, production and design.

“The time to replace analog with digital is now,” said Minoru Usui, president of Seiko Epson Corp., citing the “outstanding quality and great cost performance for small-lot production” that digital technologies, whether hardware or printing, can offer. Epson produces four categories of digital technology: inkjet printers, visual technology, wearable technology and robotics.

“We’re seeing a shift in the way design departments are keeping up with the consumer, thanks to social media driving instant gratification,” said Anthony Cenname, vice president and publisher of WSJ Magazine, who moderated the panel.

“What we’re looking at from a tech perspective is—how will technology affect us most? Both at retail and in terms of the customer experience,” said Barry McGeough, group vice president at PVH Innovation Next, the country’s second-largest apparel importer. While joking about the “iPhone-ization of our industry,” like “a drone showing up at your house with a bottle of Windex,” the challenges are very real, he said. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are becoming more-important tools, he said, citing companies such as StitchFix that are using AI successfully.

“Technology has affected every part of our business,” said independent designer Erin Fetherston, whose brand is 12 years old. “It’s rapidly accelerating the way we do business and consumers’ expectations. See-now, buy-now is where technology is our greatest aid.”

From initial online inspiration—which used to mean “going to the library to check out old issues of Vogue”—to final tweaks of finished apparel, technology affects all her work, she said.

“Technology has changed a lot of things,” agreed Paolo Crespi, commercial director of For.Tex, a leading company in the production of dyes, thickeners, and products for fabric pre- and post-treatment, based in Como, Italy, that is owned by Epson.

photo

Erin Fetherston, designer at Erin Fetherston

photo

Assaf Ziv, creative director at Elie Tahari

“People used to do four collections a year, and with digital it’s changed completely,” he said. “It used to take three to four weeks to produce a design and now it takes a few days. There’s no limitation on colors, for example.”

Digital technology allows for quick, short runs, said McGeough, allowing designers to make capsule collections. Customization “at the retail level is not novel any longer. That’s gone. That’s now table stakes.”

The ability to hyper-customize is more important than ever, agreed Fetherston. “I see the individual customer wanting more and more uniqueness. It feels like everyone wants a unique piece.” That means making fewer units, “the opposite of how you’d strategize manufacturing from a few years ago.”

Digital printing allows for much greater flexibility, said Assaf Ziv, creative director of Elie Tahari. “We can print on lace and sequins, making an illusion of 3D or 4D. For us, it’s essential. It’s a big tool.”

The industry also needs to focus more on R&D and make use of what it already knows, McGeough added.

“The data are floating around waiting for us to find it and use it,” he said. “Look for what people want by looking at the data you already have. Data analysis in fashion is a big job now. We were gently chided by Intel, who told us, ‘Wake up! You’re a data company.’ I would totally agree.”

Sustainable production is also aided by technology, he said. “If we can take the water process out, we can take out costs and speed up efficiency,” he said. “How do we compete with the H&Ms and Uniqlos of the world, who put out 26 seasons a year? We’re going to do that by being closer to the market by using robotics and automated processes. It’s all about lead-time optimization. How can we make our market more competitive? By focusing on speed, lower costs and reduced inventory.”

Having fiber created at needle “is very, very important,” he added. “That could be a really compelling proposition.”

Article written by Caitlin Kelly for California Apparel News

Edcon CEO “free to walk the floor” as financial gymnastics end

By Sasha Planting   for Moneyweb

At the end of February private equity firm Bain Capital walked away from its acquisition of Edcon with nothing to show for its decade-long investment.

As a result roughly 48 000 staff breathed a monumental sigh of relief. Without the R27 billion debt load and annual interest bill of R4.1 billion, the retail group has a fighting chance of survival. Debt is now reduced to about R7 billion and the annual interest bill is R500 000 – small change in the scheme of things.

However while the group’s turnaround strategy is showing ‘green shoots’, the executive team and the new board, which replaces the previous Bain-heavy board, have their work cut out for them.

The new board became necessary following the capital restructure whereby debt-holders swapped their debt for equity, in the process acquiring a majority shareholding in the group. The new shareholders include SA’s major banks as well as international investment firms such as Franklin Templeton. A BEE consortium owns the remaining 20%.

None of these institutions are represented on the new board, opting instead to help select an independent board. From an initial list of 30 candidates, the selection panel selected six new board members, with the seventh, Keith Warburton, the only person from the previous board. According to Edcon CEO Bernie Brookes no one declined the invitation to join the board.

“We have what we wanted – a strong chairman, strong financial skills, good retail knowledge, an understanding of debt (which we needed to retain once Bain walked away), as well as a recognition of diversity,” he says.

One criterion for the board members was that they could not have big workloads outside of Edcon. “We were not interested in people with four or more directorships,” says Brookes, “we will be calling on the board extensively, far more so than in a publically-listed firm.”

The board has three vital roles: to oversee the execution of strategy; to ensure a good exit for shareholders, and to manage shareholders, who, lets face it, have had a tough time.

This support will free the CEO to ‘walk the floor’. Edcon’s debt troubles meant that Brookes (pictured left) and his team spent most of the past year engaged in ‘financial gymnastics’ rather than driving the operational changes necessary.

The turnaround strategy, which Brookes says he is ‘warming to’ as it starts to prove itself, has not yet made its mark on the bottom line. In the three-month period ending December 24 2016, Edcon sales declined by about 3% compared to the same three-month period the year before, while gross and Ebitda margins declined by about 3% and 2%, respectively.

This was to be expected. Edgars alone has closed about 140 stores. The retailer has also abandoned its expensive adventure with international brands, cutting brands represented from 37 to about 8 as it focuses on homegrown favourites like Kelso, Stone Harbour and Penny C. In the process Edgars has had to write off about R300 million in old stock, which “cost us dearly,” says Brookes.

Margins have also come under pressure as Edgars and Jet management have had a hard look at what it takes to compete and have dropped prices accordingly. “International players in this market are forcing apparel retailers to relook their speed to market, their quality and their price points,” he says.

“They [international players] will continue to grow in this market, which is a global phenomenon, and local retailers will have to learn to compete – next will come supermarkets like Aldi and Lidl.”

While the new strategy is not in all stores yet, it is resonating with customers. For instance trading at Edgars Canal Walk has increased from R7 000 per m²/month to R24 000 m²/month. Across the group sales have increased for each of the last three quarters – though not enough to generate positive growth yet.

The fall in credit sales, which was precipitous following the sale of the book to Absa, has also been steadied. That’s because Edcon is now funding the lower LSM customer off its own book – which the retailer can now afford to do.

Brookes is confident that the department store model, which has not fared well in South Africa over the last 20 years, has a place. “The likes of John Lewis, Selfridges, Takashimaya in Singapore or Galeries Lafayette in France show that if you can put customer service first, provide customers with a one-stop solution, differentiate yourself and create a sense of ‘theatre’ in store, you can succeed.”

This is no small task. However an elephant is not eaten in one bite. The first breakthrough will come with positive sales growth which Brookes expects in six to nine months time. “It took a long time to break this business, it will take time to repair.”

Author: Sasha Planting

Twenty things to do before your fashion retail interview.

While it’s perfectly normal to feel nervous, excited and a bit stressed when going for an interview in the fast paced fashion industry, proper planning and preparation can go a long way to eliminate a lot of stress and calm your nerves. We compiled a list of things you can do to help you show yourself at your very best and eliminate some of the anxiety.  

 

Research

  1. Visit one of their stores.
  2. Look at their websites
  3. Study their competition.
  4. Know who the senior management team is (CEO, HRD, etc.)
  5. Check the history, ownership and recent mergers.
  6. Check out the social media or professional profiles of the company and/or your interviewer.
  7. Look at their financial data and share price.
  8. Look up previous news stories.
  9. Find out about the company culture.
  10. Make sure you know the dress code.

 

Personal preparation.

  1. Check your journey.
  2. Get to the interview 30 minutes early, but don’t announce yourself until 10 minutes before your appointment time.
  3. Be pleasant to the receptionist, the security guard and anyone you meet on or near the company’s premises.
  4. Don’t smoke just before you go in.
  5. Get rid of your chewing gum before you go near the company’s premises.
  6. Switch your mobile phone OFF before arrival. If you forget and it rings, don’t answer it.
  7. Mention the company’s recent success and achievements.
  8. Don’t comment on any bad publicity.
  9. If appropriate, wear something that the company sells.
  10. Make sure your social media profiles are appropriate.

By Lionel Krieger for Traut Personnel

From the boot of a car to the malls of the world: How Cotton On built a global business

Article penned by Zeenat Moorad, Associate editor at the Financial Mail

A NIMBLE APPROACH TO FASHION

From the boot of a car to the malls of the From a humble start selling jeans out of a car boot the Aussie retailer has become a global operation

There exist a few lesser known truths about Cotton On’s expansion across SA.

For instance, the CEO of one of the largest mall operators in the country once tried to sneak out of his office to avoid a meeting with the (then) little-known Australian retailer.

Today it would be hard to find a shopping centre in SA where Cotton On — through its seven brands — is not a tenant.

When, in 2011, it opened its first store in SA at Clearwater Mall on the West Rand, which by some accounts could be considered the retail boonies, there wasn’t much in the way of a “fast-fashion” offering for local shoppers. This retail model, most synonymous with Inditex’s Zara and Hennes & Mauritz (H&M), is, essentially, nimbleness in interpreting trends. Retailers, through integrated manufacturing and logistics systems, deliver small batches of product on a (sometimes) daily, weekly or bi-weekly basis. Inventory turns over quickly, the newness keeps shoppers coming back and there’s very little overstock. If something doesn’t work, it can be pulled from stores with relative ease.

Though not widely recognised, by 2011 the Australian start-up had adopted advanced replenishment systems, having moved to direct sourcing at least a decade before. Retail was becoming too competitive to have a middleman.

Until then, and to all outward appearances, privately owned Cotton On was just another clothing brand selling “stuff”. However, expansion outside its home market was gaining pace, with new store openings in New Zealand, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Dubai.

Upheaval had also created opportunity.

The global financial crisis was seen as a chance to enter the US — sites were suddenly available in centres that they couldn’t otherwise have afforded.

Cotton On, when it opened in SA, had a different view on cost of production, timelines and lead orders, very foreign to the way SA retailers were operating, says Sasfin’s Alec Abraham.
“They [the local retailers] were all cut from the same cloth, as it were … and had a certain perception of distribution and the dynamics of fashion because they only really competed against each other,” he says.

The same year, another store opened in SA, in Sandton City. It remains one of Cotton On’s top 10 global stores by sales.

There was a span of just eight weeks between signing the deal with Sandton City co-owners Liberty Group and Pareto and opening the then 1,200m² store on November 11 2011.

The store fit-out was built in two weeks, it took four weeks to get to SA by ship and a further two to be installed in Sandton City.

For a brand that at one time was not wholly convinced that the country was even a right fit, Cotton On, in less than five years, amassed a footprint just shy of 200 stores in SA.

It has three distribution centres — Pomona near Johannesburg, Pinetown near Durban, and Kuils River in Cape Town. Last year it trialled local manufacturing for menswear and books.

“We’ve had above 30% year-on-year growth all the five years that we’ve been in SA and we’ve had positive [comparable] growth for all those five years,” says CFO Michael Hardwick. “We did just on R1.8bn [in sales] in SA in our last financial year. The plan for the current year, and we’re at June year-end — three or four months into the new financial year — is to achieve around R2.25bn.”

It’s widely conceded that SA retailers have always been stronger on operational execution than innovation and creativity.

So when Cotton On brought something experientially different through the look of their stores and with their merchandise, it resonated with local customers.

According to consumer consultant and TED speaker Joseph Pine, experiences are a distinct economic offering — as distinct from services as services are from goods. Time, he says, is the currency of all experiences, and the more time customers spend with retailers, the more money they will spend now and in the future.

This concept of “dwell time” is quite an integral part of Cotton On Group’s positioning. Whether through phone-charging stations, roomier fitting rooms, free yoga sessions, kiddies’ playtime areas or even DJ decks and photo booths, stores — through what is effectively retail theatre — aim to create stickiness between customers and their brands.

“We would rather be seen as a place than a store,” says Felicity McGahan, Cotton On’s global general manager.

“It’s about engaging with the customer — bringing the fun back to shopping — and that has got to be what we focus on, otherwise we give too much to online [shopping platforms] because that’s what they can’t offer, the personal contact, the experience.”

The average basket size at the Cotton On brand is between R300 and R400. At Cotton On Kids it’s R480 and R510, and at stationery brand Typo, where 5% of the range is localised, it’s roughly R200.

“[Cotton On] made the SA market become more fashion observant,” says independent retail analyst Syd Vianello. “They made other retailers pay more attention to fashion. The mere fact that they could get tons of stores up and running so quickly made people look up.”
In retail, the understated approach is not all that unusual. There are owners and companies for whom flash or the spotlight is not de rigueur. Take Ingvar Kamprad, the Swedish founder of the Ikea furniture franchise, or Zara founder Amancio Ortega, for example. Both favour introversion over the limelight, letting their senior guard of executives take centre stage.

The opposite end of the spectrum would include the likes of Topshop’s Sir Philip Green or Solomon Lew of Country Road infamy.

Cotton On, for most of its 25 years, has led an under-the-radar, almost self-effacing existence — an extension of its founder, Nigel Austin.

He has only ever given two interviews — this report contains one of them, and it didn’t take place in a boardroom over tea and biscuits.

Cotton On, if anything, is not conventional.

At its HQ, based out of Geelong — a regional city on Melbourne’s surf coast — employees can bring their dogs to work; in lieu of death by PowerPoint the company does monthly braais (or “barbies”) to update staff on sales and plans; and it employs the services of full-time personal trainers and offers mindfulness training.

Globally, fluorescent lighting and beige walls are steadily becoming a provocation of the past as workspaces, particularly in creative fields, become more aesthetically inviting and collaborative. Studies have found that this boosts morale, stimulates employee productivity, and ultimately reflects and reinforces company culture. Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters are designed to resemble a giant birdhouse and Google, in its London hub, has a 90m running track and sleep pods.

It’s hard to articulate what Cotton On’s Geelong office is like, except to say it reminds one of a scrapbooking project on steroids. There’s a giant slide in the centre of the Cotton On Kids office and a cafeteria that sells organic kombucha and beetroot chips. It has a wall of fame for staffers and the kids they sponsor in Uganda through the Cotton On Foundation (the group has raised A$50m over nine years through in-store sales of tissues, water and bracelets).

It’s on a 14,000m² industrial estate flanked by an automotive repair store, a fire station and a joinery. And what is seemingly incongruous whereabouts for a global fashion company actually epitomises Cotton On Group’s “feet on the ground” vim.

“We own everything we build on,” says CEO Peter Johnson. “We want to create an environment that’s conducive not only to productivity but is also just somewhere pleasant to work. We moved here nine years ago, our grassroots are in Geelong. We started with 50 people and today there are 1,400 of us.”

We’re sitting on a pink couch in one of the group’s pause areas when he rolls out the design plan to show me. The envisioned size following the redevelopment will be 30,000m².

It includes more breakout spaces, a sustainable café that will grow its own vegetables, and new amenities in its health and wellness facility — like a spin studio and an on-site osteopath.

I ask about new markets.

“We forward-plan three years. We always look at making sure we have future growth in the pipeline and we know a new country adds another level of complexity. So when, in year two or three, the growth opportunities start to slow down or dry up, we then say it’s time to add another country. A new country will take between 12 months and three years to get volume so it’s important we have this overlapping strategy.”

China is on the agenda, as are more cities in North America.

I meet Austin (who owns 90% of the business) at Cotton On’s flagship store in the Melbourne CBD at Bourke Street Mall, where he stands outside with cousin (on his mother’s side) and co-owner Ashley “Ash” Hardwick, who owns the remaining stake.

When I ask (but only towards the end of our interview) why the company is not that publicity averse any more, Austin says: “It’s a big serious business. We have all the right checks and balances and ethical frameworks in place. We didn’t want people guessing who we were.”

It does, of course, also have to do with attracting the right talent as a thriving global business. Often this talent will need to come from competitors, says New Zealand-based retail consultant Chris Wilkinson from First Retail Group.

“Advisers may be working with other leading brands and be cautious about relationships — and commercial partners such as property owners — or suppliers may not fully understand the brand, its back story and potential,” he adds.

About 33% of the group’s global brand managers in its adult business are South African. Its recent recruitment blitz has, according to local analysts, has been to the detriment of Mr Price.

“The guys who run Australia and Malaysia for us now are South African. The level of talent to come out of SA also really surprised us,” Austin says.

The pair (and, plainly, most of the executive team) resemble the cast of the BBC’s Peaky Blinders rather than rheumatic shopkeepers who run a global operation of more than 1,500 stores in 18 countries.

Austin and Ash Hardwick are soft spoken, initially, but become increasingly ebullient as we do a walkabout of the store — they are, after all, on their own turf and talking retail.

If there’s one thing SA has turned out to be for Cotton On Group, it’s a surprise.

They both recall visiting years ago and being unsure about setting up shop in SA, owing to a mall environment that didn’t seem that sophisticated and “girls that were really not dressing in fashion”.

The draw, however, was that none of their international competitors were in SA yet and the market didn’t exist. Whether by wily knowingness or pluck, the bet paid off.

“What I’m really seeing in the SA market now is how well the girls are dressing — it’s really changed,” says Austin. “A lot of it is things like Instagram — shoppers are so connected digitally.” He adds that structured products like blazers, “bodycon” dresses — short for “body conscious” (read:
tight and hugs all the curves) — and denim are big in SA.

“There’s a lot more stretch [in the denim Cotton On sells in SA] and higher rises for the bigger booties,” he says.

They get together every quarter with the local teams, who present the attributes of their markets that are different to the core assortment. Buyers then select accordingly.

Daniel Isaacs, an equity analyst at 36One Asset Management, says that in SA, other than Mr Price, cheaper clothes weren’t stylish or stylish clothes could be relatively expensive (requiring credit from the credit retailers to purchase them).

“I would say the main thing Cotton On brought here was more of an offering in that ‘stylish at attractive prices’ category, and as we can see, it is a lucrative category. Cotton On has probably been the most successful international retailer in SA so far,” he says.

I ask Austin and Ash Hardwick, as we make our way to the group’s other stores in the mall, if they had any apprehension coming into an apparel market that was historically characterised by store-card credit and not cash. Internationally, retailers don’t typically sell on credit.

“Credit was an interesting philosophical discussion about whether or not we wanted our kids going into debt. It was something we wrestled with for a while,” Austin says.

Ash Hardwick adds: “It was also the most compelling part of the offer from some of the [local] retailers, but not necessarily what we wanted to be known for.”

Cotton On Group does offer store credit now through RCS — but it’s less than 1% of the SA business.

For all intents and purposes, Cotton On Group is really a big fat family, held together by a gossamer of cousins and friends. The company has an advisory team and executive teams for brands, support functions and regions.

The story goes that Austin, while studying business in 1988, started selling acid-wash denim jackets from the boot of his car at the Beckley Market in Geelong to get through university. His first trip to the market wasn’t a success — he made A$30.

The following week, he dropped his prices after negotiating with his supplier and subsequently sold out.

His supplier happened to be his father, the late clothing wholesaler Grant Austin.

Austin Jnr went on to open his first retail store in Geelong in 1991, behind his grandfather’s butcher shop.

“I used to talk to my dad twice a day. Also, I grew up around my granddad, he was a merchant,” he says.
While in school, Austin worked in his father’s Hong Kong office and frequented trade fairs to find suppliers, with many of whom Cotton On still has a relationship.

James Stewart, a Melbourne-based partner at Ferrier Hodgson, says Cotton On Group was one of the few Australian retailers to rapidly scale its business and move to direct sourcing, “which gave them first-mover advantage”.

About a year ago, the company reached out to leadership big cheese Jim Collins (he’s written books like Good to Great, Built to Last and How the Mighty Fall). After six months of prep, about 32 execs went to Colorado in the US to attend one of his coveted workshops,

“He told me that Warren Buffett made 95% of his wealth after he was 50,” Austin says. “He reminded me that we were just getting started — it made us small again and gave us clarity. We were struggling to articulate our strategy and it forced us to get clear.

“We asked ourselves whether whatever had been successful for us in the past, was still going to be good enough. Our [Austin and Ash Hardwick’s] roles have changed from seeing and executing, to seeing and coaching.”

IPO talk always seems to dog the group. And its always said it prefers autonomy. The founders agree they can take more risks with the company as a private player.

“We’re only answerable to ourselves. There’s also a different filter — we start with, ‘What’s the right thing to do? What will the customer love?’ We don’t have to commercialise everything. It’s not about every quarter but the next five to 10 years,” says Ash Hardwick.

As is customary in retail, Cotton On has had some infamy: it was fined A$1m for selling highly flammable children’s sleepwear, misleadingly labelled as “low fire danger”. It also recalled earth globes from Typo stores that named Palestine but omitted to label Israel.

The only region it’s pulled out of has been Germany.
When I ask (but only towards the end of our interview) why the company is not that publicity averse any more, Austin says: “It’s a big serious business. We have all the right checks and balances and ethical frameworks in place. We didn’t want people guessing who we were.”

It does, of course, also have to do with attracting the right talent as a thriving global business. Often this talent will need to come from competitors, says New Zealand-based retail consultant Chris Wilkinson from First Retail Group.

“Advisers may be working with other leading brands and be cautious about relationships — and commercial partners such as property owners — or suppliers may not fully understand the brand, its back story and potential,” he adds.

About 33% of the group’s global brand managers in its adult business are South African. Its recent recruitment blitz has, according to local analysts, has been to the detriment of Mr Price.

“The guys who run Australia and Malaysia for us now are South African. The level of talent to come out of SA also really surprised us,” Austin says.

Author:  Zeenat Moorad

CMO: Social Media and Fashion Retail—Frenemies or Friends with Benefits?

by Maya Mikhailov, CMO and co-founder of GPShopper
Social media has blown open the gated community that was once luxury fashion. No longer are fashion houses exerting full control over the images, videos and styling of their clothing. Instead, an army of online fashionistas are presenting their take on the latest fashion to their millions of followers. Brands and retailers alike scrambling to catch up are finding that with a tailored approach, social can move from a frenemy to a friend with myriad benefits from reaching multiple audiences to now converting an actual sale.

Swipe Right for Style

The modern shopper spends six hours or more per week researching fashion on their mobile phones, with much of that time spent in social media platforms, according to data from GPShopper, making social the go-tool for fashion inspiration.

While most fashion brands tightly curate their Instagram feeds and YouTube channels, some, such as Burberry and Louis Vuitton, offer unedited behind-the-scenes access via Snapchat Stories. While this rawness breaks with years of editorial tradition, it represents a keen understanding of social in attracting an audience’s attention. Snapchat is a casual and ephemeral conversation; Instagram a more polished and filtered brand voice. Using social streams helps brands position themselves to multiple audiences without diluting exclusivity and brand strength.

Fashion houses are also pairing with social stars to extend their brand reach. Kendall Jenner and Chiara Ferragni, to name just two, have acquired impressive amounts of Instagram followers, giving them influence over fashion loyalists. Brands invite key influencers to sit front row at their shows, driving inspiration and demand by live streaming their thoughts and opinions to a captive audience. Some brands have gone even further by sending clothing or sponsoring influencers. These influencers can command anywhere from $60,000 – $300,000 a post on popular social media networks, which brands are willingly paying for access to likes from their loyal followers.

From #Like to #Buy

Although social likes are certainly important in driving inspiration, the question some fashion brands are asking is can those likes lead to sales? Although Twitter briefly flirted with a “Buy Button” initiative, other social networks are still working to expand their reach into direct sales. Following in Twitter and Pinterest’s footsteps, Instagram is now attempting to answer that question with the recent addition of the shopping tags. One major stumbling block for new entrants is the mistaken attitude that social media must be accountable to direct sales, rather than storytelling. The risk in linking every inspirational photo with a “click to buy” is potentially cheapening the underlying lifestyle sold by the brand. Not every image needs to come with a “For Sale” sign and savvier fashion brands wisely exercise care with using direct buy option.

Although Twitter’s experiment with purchase didn’t quite materialize, it is still a powerful tool to drive sales – in other channels. By using its inherent advantage as a megaphone or call-to-action, major shoe brands such as Adidas and Nike have successfully leveraged Twitter for years to release new products announce shoe drops in stores, and run raffles for limited edition pairs.

The interesting side effect of the shopping tag paradigm is that it will likely add some accountability to social influencers in a very precisely measured way. This will prove to be an interesting shakeout between those who can drive likes and those that drive dollars.

WeChat and Chill?

The rising power of chat applications is another evolution of social and one where fashion brands can have ongoing conversations with consumers. WeChat, with well over 700M users, is impossible to ignore, and although 92% of global luxury brands have a WeChat account, most are still barely scratching the surface of effectively communicating with their audience. Coach and Burberry are among the global leaders on WeChat – they stream shows, send out announcements and greetings to fans, and open digital mini-shops with full commerce capabilities. Dior has even held exclusive WeChat flash sales for their legions of fans. However, many brands are using WeChat to answer questions and field customer service requests.

WeChat is not the only platform where one-to-one connection can lead to better brand engagement. Fashion leaders such as KITH use Facebook Messenger to enhance their customer service with opt-in alerts for orders and shipment tracking. These service messages, exclusive to email previously, allow brands to hold conversations with their customers, can lead to better service and brand loyalty.

Sign me up

Despite initial struggles with acceptance and voice, social media has proven to be an important tool for fashion brands. Emerging brands can use social media to get the type of reach they never could have imagined in the world of print magazines. Recognizing that different forms of social play unique roles in the interest, purchase, and loyalty cycle means that more brands and fashion houses are pursuing a diverse social strategy, leveraging the inherent strengths of each platform to unleash significant benefits to top of mind presence to bottom-line sales.
This article originally appeared in the psfk blog and was written by Maya Mikhailov.

Market applauds TFG’s 14.5% sales growth

Article written by colleen Goko for BDLive
Retailer TFG reported double-digit sales growth for the nine months to December, a feat that was widely applauded by the market, sending the share price soaring more than 6% in intraday trade.

The upbeat update was a welcome surprise for investors following a poor showing by both Woolworths and Truworths last week.

In the nine months to December 24, TFG reported a 14.5% rise in group sales. Between November 27 and December 24 2016, sales increased 14.6% compared with the year-earlier period.

TFG’s share price closed 5.29% higher at R168.50.

Mergence Investment Managers equity analyst Peter Takaendesa said the sales growth rate was a bit better than consensus expectations of 13.5%.

“What’s quite clear in the results is that TFG is continuing to execute better than its peers and the retail sector in general experienced better trading conditions over the December festive period,” Takaendesa said.

“The weaker pound is likely to continue to dilute the results from their UK operations as evident in results for the latest three months to December but we expect the improvement in their South African operations to offset that pound headwind.”

In the nine months, turnover growth for TFG International was 47.8% in pound terms. TFG said the international operations were performing in line with management’s expectation.

Growth for TFG Africa was 9.7% with same store sales growth of 3.7%. Cash sales grew 17.4% and credit sales 2.7% in the period under review.

Ashburton Investments fund manager Wayne McCurrie said TFG was doing extremely well.

“The performance exceeded management’s own expectation. What we can see is that they are not suffering from the increasing foreign competition yet. They [TFG] are getting their clothing ranges and price correct. They can offer their merchandise at a competitive price.”

TFG’s broader range of merchandise categories compared with its retail peers has cushioned it against the economic headwinds that the retail sector has endured. Its brands include apparel retailers Markham,
Due South and G-Star Raw, jewellery brands Sterns and American Swiss, and furniture store @home.

Last week Truworths reported a 21% increase in group sales for the 26 weeks to December 25, to R10.2bn (including sales from its UK fashion footwear chain Office Retail Group). But Truworths’ like-for-like retail sales (excluding Office Retail Group) decreased 3%.

Truworths cited increased pressure on consumers from rising inflation, a weak employment market and soft real growth in incomes as factors for its poor performance. It expects to report a decrease of between 2% and 6% in interim diluted headline earnings per share.

Woolworths reported a volume decline in both the clothing and food divisions in the 26 weeks to December 25.
Source: BDLive, Author :COLLEEN GOKO